A good deal of discussion is taking place around the idea of peer support workers in mental health practice. A recent Guardian article entitled 'Putting the lunatics in charge of the asylum' has highlighted the debate.
It's not just the 'asylum', hospital, day centre or residential setting where peer support working can take place. Nor does a peer support or recovery worker have to be an official post, paid or voluntary within the NHS or any clinical setting.
Peer support in mental health is taking place informally all over the place. Many peer supporters would not even give themselves such a title. In many cases they are simply spending time with the friends they already know or with the peers who have accessed a setting or venue which attracts them too.
As a bridge builder who has signposted people with severe and enduring mental health diagnoses to mainstream settings of their own choice, I have witnessed this peer support happen over and again.
Four years ago I signposted a client to a mainstream recording studio. With the help of direct payments he has been accessing this venue weekly ever since, practising guitar and collaborating with others in the studio. He has also secured part-time employment as a studio assistant, getting the rehearsal rooms ready for bands and bookings.
What has happened as a result of this client's involvement is an informal cascading of peer support and group participation. Again, this has occurred with very little prompting from the bridge builder. As my client relishes working with other musicians, he is happy to have peers who also wish to participate i.e. start a band during his weekly studio sessions. This has resulted in a drummer peer and a singer peer rehearsing regularly together with Bernie (not his real name). Another peer also attends regularly - a long-term friend of Bernie who is learning guitar from him and who has previously been impossible to place by the bridge building team in any mainstream setting.
This is informal and highly effective peer support. Above all, it is taking place in mainstream not in any clinical, residential or daycare setting. Recovery that takes place in mainstream allows for hope, confidence, friendship, group projects and routes to employment.
Showing posts with label bridge building for mainstream. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bridge building for mainstream. Show all posts
Sunday, 4 March 2012
Wednesday, 13 July 2011
The viral effect of mainstream
Things can happen when a client with a mental health condition is allowed the opportunity to access mainstream on his or her own terms. Mainstream can be highly supportive of clients' individual aspirations and self-development. Sometimes this encouragement comes directly from the mainstream outlet itself rather than being dictated by carers, statutory services or voluntary agencies.
There are sound reasons for this. Mainstream allows individuals to access services as consumers with consumer rights. If someone with a mental health diagnosis freely chooses to develop his or her aspirations in a mainstream environment, there is no good reason why that person should be denied any of the services that particular venue may provide. The client is accessing mainstream as a consumer of that service, not as a 'diagnosis'.
Once a firm relationship with mainstream has been established, there are multiple ways that mainstream finds to continue to develop individual hopes, dreams and aspirations. I have clients who have found employment through accessing music by rehearsing regularly in a mainstream recording studio. This has not happened because I have requested the venue to provide employment for my clients. Far from it, the venue itself has instigated the process that can lead an individual towards a working role in the environment where he or she happens to feel most fulfilled.
This is the viral effect of mainstream
There are sound reasons for this. Mainstream allows individuals to access services as consumers with consumer rights. If someone with a mental health diagnosis freely chooses to develop his or her aspirations in a mainstream environment, there is no good reason why that person should be denied any of the services that particular venue may provide. The client is accessing mainstream as a consumer of that service, not as a 'diagnosis'.
Once a firm relationship with mainstream has been established, there are multiple ways that mainstream finds to continue to develop individual hopes, dreams and aspirations. I have clients who have found employment through accessing music by rehearsing regularly in a mainstream recording studio. This has not happened because I have requested the venue to provide employment for my clients. Far from it, the venue itself has instigated the process that can lead an individual towards a working role in the environment where he or she happens to feel most fulfilled.
This is the viral effect of mainstream
Wednesday, 30 March 2011
Libraries and mental health
Shaun Bailey, an ambassador for the big society project and a former Conservative prospective candidate, has asserted that local councils are closing public libraries because they are "not being used". (Radio 4 'Today 'programme).
Where has he been? Over the last three years local libraries have become a major resource for mental health in the south-west London borough where I work as a bridge builder. The libraries are being used as never before.
As part of the movement to mainstream independence, mental health provider Imagine has moved its day centre services into the local libraries. Not only does this dramatically decrease the marginalisation of people with mental health challenges but it also enables more access for more people. Libraries in their role as community providers have never been more useful and more utilised. The stigma of mental ill-health is itself sidelined when service users access libraries along with the rest of the general public. That's mainstream.
Library managers and staff were amongst the first to sign up for mental health awareness training when it was offered in the borough.
I count libraries are amongst the most socially inclusive environments in contemporary community life. My client meetings often take place in the local library. Meeting in a library is one of the best ways to start the conversation about mainstream in a non-clinical setting.
Mainstream can only take place in and from mainstream. Libraries are at the forefront of the practice of inclusion.
Where has he been? Over the last three years local libraries have become a major resource for mental health in the south-west London borough where I work as a bridge builder. The libraries are being used as never before.
As part of the movement to mainstream independence, mental health provider Imagine has moved its day centre services into the local libraries. Not only does this dramatically decrease the marginalisation of people with mental health challenges but it also enables more access for more people. Libraries in their role as community providers have never been more useful and more utilised. The stigma of mental ill-health is itself sidelined when service users access libraries along with the rest of the general public. That's mainstream.
Library managers and staff were amongst the first to sign up for mental health awareness training when it was offered in the borough.
I count libraries are amongst the most socially inclusive environments in contemporary community life. My client meetings often take place in the local library. Meeting in a library is one of the best ways to start the conversation about mainstream in a non-clinical setting.
Mainstream can only take place in and from mainstream. Libraries are at the forefront of the practice of inclusion.
Friday, 18 March 2011
Clinical and social models of care in mental health
In the mental health field, it has long been accepted that clinical and social models of care go hand-in-hand. Doing more than simply addressing clinical symptoms is a requirement of the care pathway.
People who have experienced severe and enduring mental health conditions currently have access to a spectrum of professional care. This can range from the psychiatrist, the community mental health nurse, assertive outreach and social workers, O.T.s and other key personnel. Any or all of these individuals can currently form part of the care plan for people recovering from severe mental health conditions. In addition, there is access to third-party groups providing bridge building or similar services. The return to mainstream life based on individual choices forms a strong part of the clinical and social models working together.
So what will be the scenario when mental health moves into the sphere of general practice, along with a host of other clinical services?
In the UK, GP consortia are being set up with the intention of taking over from the primary care teams entirely by the year 2013. The primary care teams that currently incorporate a spectrum of care services for mental health will no longer exist. It is uncertain whether GP consortia and GP surgeries will be equipped to respond to providing the clinical and social models which currently operate. What this means is that there could be no access to the key services that are well-positioned to provide access for the individual to his or her independence, recovery and self-development.
The providers who currently enable access to mainstream life for people with mental health conditions will need to introduce themselves to the GP consortia as a matter of urgency. In order to become better placed to continue the work of mainstream recovery it will be important to do this now. Commercial and private providers are already muscling in on the GP consortia and it is unlikely that these groups will have any expertise at all in providing hope and aspiration for marginalised people.
People who have experienced severe and enduring mental health conditions currently have access to a spectrum of professional care. This can range from the psychiatrist, the community mental health nurse, assertive outreach and social workers, O.T.s and other key personnel. Any or all of these individuals can currently form part of the care plan for people recovering from severe mental health conditions. In addition, there is access to third-party groups providing bridge building or similar services. The return to mainstream life based on individual choices forms a strong part of the clinical and social models working together.
So what will be the scenario when mental health moves into the sphere of general practice, along with a host of other clinical services?
In the UK, GP consortia are being set up with the intention of taking over from the primary care teams entirely by the year 2013. The primary care teams that currently incorporate a spectrum of care services for mental health will no longer exist. It is uncertain whether GP consortia and GP surgeries will be equipped to respond to providing the clinical and social models which currently operate. What this means is that there could be no access to the key services that are well-positioned to provide access for the individual to his or her independence, recovery and self-development.
The providers who currently enable access to mainstream life for people with mental health conditions will need to introduce themselves to the GP consortia as a matter of urgency. In order to become better placed to continue the work of mainstream recovery it will be important to do this now. Commercial and private providers are already muscling in on the GP consortia and it is unlikely that these groups will have any expertise at all in providing hope and aspiration for marginalised people.
Friday, 4 March 2011
What does Pat Deegan mean by 'a career in mental health'?
When Dr. Pat Deegan coined the phrase 'a career in mental health' she was referring to endemic features of the mental health system prevailing at the time when she was first clinically diagnosed. A 'career in mental health' was the path that her specialists advised would become her future. It would mean a life on benefits, no chance of employment and massively limited access to opportunities. It would mean an end to her aspirations, and end to her hopes. Effectively, the end of a career.
For people who have been through secondary mental health experiences in the UK, a 'career in mental health' can still be the norm. Huge inroads have been made nonetheless. The recovery programmes that have been set up by many clinical teams all around the country. The user-led services that are widely encouraged and supported. The involvement in recruiting people who have experienced mental health conditions for employment within services. The movement from supported accommodation to independent living. The emphasis on mainstream by third-sector organisations working alongside the NHS and statutory services. The 'paths to personalisation' programme and the independence-based use of direct payments and personal budgets.
All of these initiatives and more are continuing to help enable people with severe and enduring diagnoses to find personal autonomy and make a break from the pitifully bleak reality of Deegan's appositely-described 'career in mental health'.
But what of the future?
In the UK we are witnessing the root-and-branch dismantling of mental health services as they currently stand. There will be no more primary care teams and more and more people are being discharged from CMHTs (Community Mental Health Teams). Within two years consortia of GPs and general practice surgeries will become the budget-holders both for primary and secondary mental health care.
At this stage there is no way of telling whether these changes will be for the better or for the worse. The only implacable fact is change itself and that changes are going to be massive and across the board.
The fallout from the first tremors of change is already with us. The much-vaunted personalisation programme was due to be rolled out universally throughout the UK within 18 months. Now I feel it is unlikely to happen at all. Personal budgets could well be forgotten in the midst of the general upheaval of services. Certainly, direct payments for mental health have become a thing of the past, at least in the south-west London borough where I work as a bridge builder. This is despite service users having a legal right to direct payments where these can be shown to be a strong factor in their recoveries.
The experience of personalisation in other parts of the UK may well be different and could paint a much more hopeful picture. Unfortunately, it won't last.
For people who have been through secondary mental health experiences in the UK, a 'career in mental health' can still be the norm. Huge inroads have been made nonetheless. The recovery programmes that have been set up by many clinical teams all around the country. The user-led services that are widely encouraged and supported. The involvement in recruiting people who have experienced mental health conditions for employment within services. The movement from supported accommodation to independent living. The emphasis on mainstream by third-sector organisations working alongside the NHS and statutory services. The 'paths to personalisation' programme and the independence-based use of direct payments and personal budgets.
All of these initiatives and more are continuing to help enable people with severe and enduring diagnoses to find personal autonomy and make a break from the pitifully bleak reality of Deegan's appositely-described 'career in mental health'.
But what of the future?
In the UK we are witnessing the root-and-branch dismantling of mental health services as they currently stand. There will be no more primary care teams and more and more people are being discharged from CMHTs (Community Mental Health Teams). Within two years consortia of GPs and general practice surgeries will become the budget-holders both for primary and secondary mental health care.
At this stage there is no way of telling whether these changes will be for the better or for the worse. The only implacable fact is change itself and that changes are going to be massive and across the board.
The fallout from the first tremors of change is already with us. The much-vaunted personalisation programme was due to be rolled out universally throughout the UK within 18 months. Now I feel it is unlikely to happen at all. Personal budgets could well be forgotten in the midst of the general upheaval of services. Certainly, direct payments for mental health have become a thing of the past, at least in the south-west London borough where I work as a bridge builder. This is despite service users having a legal right to direct payments where these can be shown to be a strong factor in their recoveries.
The experience of personalisation in other parts of the UK may well be different and could paint a much more hopeful picture. Unfortunately, it won't last.
Tuesday, 27 July 2010
Bridge Building for Mainstream
Bridge building for mainstream is now incorporated into the care pathway for people recovering from mental health conditions.
Community mental health teams, occupational therapies, psychiatrists are all aware of the value of mainstream bridge building. Many community mental health teams actively promote mainstream as part of their in-house practice with clients. Service-user led initiatives are also widely encouraged.
Where mental health teams may not always the time and resources to promote mainstream fully, there are many outside organisations working alongside the teams. The benefits of referral to an outside non-clinical team can be considerable.
Mental health teams can often discuss mainstream with clients in a clinical or home setting. An outside organisation has more time and capacity to draw clients out into mainstream settings where a conversation can begin. This may well be and should be - a conversation about the client's hopes, dreams, goals and aspirations.
One of the bridge builder's roles is to help facilitate this conversation. Another role is to be clued-in with what mainstream has to offer. For example, a bridge builder specialising in arts and culture needs to know what outlets there are both locally and further afield. A client who wishes to develop skills in music production should be introduced to the mainstream venue or venues where this opportunity takes place.
Community mental health teams, occupational therapies, psychiatrists are all aware of the value of mainstream bridge building. Many community mental health teams actively promote mainstream as part of their in-house practice with clients. Service-user led initiatives are also widely encouraged.
Where mental health teams may not always the time and resources to promote mainstream fully, there are many outside organisations working alongside the teams. The benefits of referral to an outside non-clinical team can be considerable.
Mental health teams can often discuss mainstream with clients in a clinical or home setting. An outside organisation has more time and capacity to draw clients out into mainstream settings where a conversation can begin. This may well be and should be - a conversation about the client's hopes, dreams, goals and aspirations.
One of the bridge builder's roles is to help facilitate this conversation. Another role is to be clued-in with what mainstream has to offer. For example, a bridge builder specialising in arts and culture needs to know what outlets there are both locally and further afield. A client who wishes to develop skills in music production should be introduced to the mainstream venue or venues where this opportunity takes place.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)