Questions
What was the mental health scene like in 2010 for those at the grittier end of the stick? What was 2010 like for people in secondary care? For people under community mental health teams?
Was there more recovery in 2010? Were people in secondary care able to access mainstream in 2010? Were they less doomed to what Dr. Pat Deegan calls 'a career in mental health'?
Did people with severe and enduring mental health conditions receive enough support from services? Did they receive the right support? Did the support help them or hinder them?
Some answers
Throughout 2010, statutory and voluntary services responded to the health challenge of independence and mainstream in several key ways. Firstly, mental health teams set up some important initiatives. These were geared towards client independence and recovery. Many predominantly service-user led.
Recovery University in the south-west London borough of Merton enables secondary care clients to access a wide spectrum of trainings and skillsets. These include preparing for work, independence and life skills, confidence building, anger management and many more. Recovery University also trains service users as trainers for forthcoming courses.
Other community initiatives are also up and running, including wellbeing programmes and access to psychological therapies. However, pyschological therapies in non-clinical settings are still not available should you happen to have a severe and enduring mental health condition.
Training the trainers often draws upon experiences and qualifications which service users have already gained within their life journeys. Mainstream groups have also utilised service user skills as part of their own training programmes in areas such as visual arts, music and creative writing. This has taken the recovery university one stage further, providing paid employment and access to mainstream.
Statutory services continued to have success in keeping people out of hospital or limiting hospital stays to a minimum. The downside of this is that more and more people are being discharged from statutory services altogether. In 2011 this will inevitably result in more pressure on GP services, as it is these practitioners who will become responsible under the latest government directives.
The rolling-out of the personalisation programme should mean more access to direct payments for many clients under mental health care plans. It should also mean more and more creative uses of direct payments, as DP is being promoted for any activity or outcome that a client deems relevant to his or her recovery. The Personal Stories videos on the NMHDU site bears witness to some of these outcomes. With more and more people being discharged from mental health services, it is crucial that personalisation is a success in the new year.
Showing posts with label mainstream. Show all posts
Showing posts with label mainstream. Show all posts
Tuesday, 21 December 2010
Friday, 8 October 2010
How mainstream is roadblocked
For many years mainstream has been perceived and practised as a key component of the care pathway in mental health provision.
At several stages of the pathway into mainstream there are roadblocks. These can occur from the individual client, from services, even from families and carers. An individual can feel apprehensive of stepping over the threshold into mainstream activities. This can be for a variety of reasons, ranging from self-stigma or from being so long in the mental health system that independence seems a very distant option. Contrary to some current opinion, it is not stigma from mainstream society that creates the main roadblock.
Dr. Pat Deegan's belief is that too often the health system can encourage what she calls 'a career in mental health' and nothing else. This viewpoint is based on her experience as a service user and it still holds true.
A great deal is being achieved by service users themselves to challenge the roadblocks. This is particularly true where creative and personalised use of direct payments and individual budgets have really taken off around the UK. It hasn't happened everywhere but some immensely inspiring stories and testimonials can be viewed at the NMHDU website.
Creative use of direct payments in mental health recovery is currently sporadic. The intention was that this should increase towards full implementation of the personalisation programme. Invididual budgets were scheduled to become the engine for much healthcare practice all over the UK by 2013. However, this is now completely overshadowed and possibly lost permanently, in the thrust towards GP consortia and budget management.
Alongside the sudden disappearance of direct payments is the disappearing access to therapies, both for primary and secondary care patients. Secondary care clients have often lost out in the therapies scenario for a variety of reasons. But clients in primary care are still entitled to a reasonably smooth road to psychological therapies. Entitlement does not ensure that those therapy services are available and in practice these too are disappearing along with personalisation and individual budgets.
Of course any client is free to fund their own mainstream recovery pathway and many do. The outcomes in this area alone (south-west London) have often been formidable. A composer who has funded her own recordings and launches now has self-employment through her music. Many are those who have accessed adult education courses and further training. Individuals have re-accessed faith venues which they had previously felt unable to enter for many years.
Not all these initiatives require direct payments - anyway those have now dried up. Many activities are free to access or funded by individual clients from their own pockets. Where direct payment has been needed it has often made the crucial difference.
Third-sector organisations also do great work in promoting access to mainstream through a variety of initiatives. 'Emergence' is an arts group run by and for service users who are also visual artists. In London and around the country 'Emergence' has pioneered access to visual arts as well as giving a platform for creativity and exhibition spaces for artists with personality disorder.
'Imagine' in south west London and Surrey also promotes a variety of arts opportunities including music production and visual arts. These are open to service users but take place in mainstream settings.
Mainstream environments have their own health, safety and insurance policies. As a consumer, the service user to entitled to the protection of these policies along with every other mainstream customer and client.
At several stages of the pathway into mainstream there are roadblocks. These can occur from the individual client, from services, even from families and carers. An individual can feel apprehensive of stepping over the threshold into mainstream activities. This can be for a variety of reasons, ranging from self-stigma or from being so long in the mental health system that independence seems a very distant option. Contrary to some current opinion, it is not stigma from mainstream society that creates the main roadblock.
Dr. Pat Deegan's belief is that too often the health system can encourage what she calls 'a career in mental health' and nothing else. This viewpoint is based on her experience as a service user and it still holds true.
A great deal is being achieved by service users themselves to challenge the roadblocks. This is particularly true where creative and personalised use of direct payments and individual budgets have really taken off around the UK. It hasn't happened everywhere but some immensely inspiring stories and testimonials can be viewed at the NMHDU website.
Creative use of direct payments in mental health recovery is currently sporadic. The intention was that this should increase towards full implementation of the personalisation programme. Invididual budgets were scheduled to become the engine for much healthcare practice all over the UK by 2013. However, this is now completely overshadowed and possibly lost permanently, in the thrust towards GP consortia and budget management.
Alongside the sudden disappearance of direct payments is the disappearing access to therapies, both for primary and secondary care patients. Secondary care clients have often lost out in the therapies scenario for a variety of reasons. But clients in primary care are still entitled to a reasonably smooth road to psychological therapies. Entitlement does not ensure that those therapy services are available and in practice these too are disappearing along with personalisation and individual budgets.
Of course any client is free to fund their own mainstream recovery pathway and many do. The outcomes in this area alone (south-west London) have often been formidable. A composer who has funded her own recordings and launches now has self-employment through her music. Many are those who have accessed adult education courses and further training. Individuals have re-accessed faith venues which they had previously felt unable to enter for many years.
Not all these initiatives require direct payments - anyway those have now dried up. Many activities are free to access or funded by individual clients from their own pockets. Where direct payment has been needed it has often made the crucial difference.
Third-sector organisations also do great work in promoting access to mainstream through a variety of initiatives. 'Emergence' is an arts group run by and for service users who are also visual artists. In London and around the country 'Emergence' has pioneered access to visual arts as well as giving a platform for creativity and exhibition spaces for artists with personality disorder.
'Imagine' in south west London and Surrey also promotes a variety of arts opportunities including music production and visual arts. These are open to service users but take place in mainstream settings.
Mainstream environments have their own health, safety and insurance policies. As a consumer, the service user to entitled to the protection of these policies along with every other mainstream customer and client.
Sunday, 25 July 2010
Mainstream - the Cascade Effect
As a social inclusion bridge builder I work with clients with severe and enduring mental health diagnoses. They are referred or they self-refer with the desire to access mainstream life domains.
Clients aspire to a variety of mainstream choices. It might be volunteering or befriending, it may be arts activities, it might be employment or running your own business. Client aspirations may include sports, faith, education, training or a selection from any or all of these.
Enabling individuals with a 'severe and enduring' background is not always a straightforward process although it certainly can be sometimes. A client can be introduced to a mainstream outlet and it can work for him or her almost immediately. Other clients may be unready for mainstream for a variety of reasons. They may suffer a relapse before accessing the mainstream environment. They may visualise mainstream as another form of day service or statutory support system, which it isn't.
Equally, clients can sometimes express a wish to access mainstream out of a misplaced fear that not accessing it might in some way affect their payments and benefits. It can be a long process before the value and rewards of mainstream are understood.
What is true is that clients who successfully access or re-access mainstream in turn become examples of mainstream's effectiveness. Signposting to mainstream as part of the mental health recovery pathway is undoubtedly effective, even if it does not work for everyone straight away.
Mainstream also helps to sustain recovery in the individual and even better, it can propagate more success and recovery out of its own resources. An example of this would be the musician who successfully links up with a mainstream recording studio. After months of regular rehearsal the musician is invited by the studio manager to contribute to a recording session. I witness this kind of beautiful outcome and its benefits for the client in my work as an arts bridge builder.
Another example - again from music bridge building - is the guitarist client who uses a studio regularly and invites a friend to join him during the session. The friend may well be another mental health service user who has never successfully engaged with mainstream despite the best efforts of the bridge building service. Where services have been unsuccessful a friendship and peer network can do the job far more effectively.
Mainstream reaches the places other services cannot reach and in the process it is able to create a cascade effect - a continuing path of development, recovery and individual growth.
Clients aspire to a variety of mainstream choices. It might be volunteering or befriending, it may be arts activities, it might be employment or running your own business. Client aspirations may include sports, faith, education, training or a selection from any or all of these.
Enabling individuals with a 'severe and enduring' background is not always a straightforward process although it certainly can be sometimes. A client can be introduced to a mainstream outlet and it can work for him or her almost immediately. Other clients may be unready for mainstream for a variety of reasons. They may suffer a relapse before accessing the mainstream environment. They may visualise mainstream as another form of day service or statutory support system, which it isn't.
Equally, clients can sometimes express a wish to access mainstream out of a misplaced fear that not accessing it might in some way affect their payments and benefits. It can be a long process before the value and rewards of mainstream are understood.
What is true is that clients who successfully access or re-access mainstream in turn become examples of mainstream's effectiveness. Signposting to mainstream as part of the mental health recovery pathway is undoubtedly effective, even if it does not work for everyone straight away.
Mainstream also helps to sustain recovery in the individual and even better, it can propagate more success and recovery out of its own resources. An example of this would be the musician who successfully links up with a mainstream recording studio. After months of regular rehearsal the musician is invited by the studio manager to contribute to a recording session. I witness this kind of beautiful outcome and its benefits for the client in my work as an arts bridge builder.
Another example - again from music bridge building - is the guitarist client who uses a studio regularly and invites a friend to join him during the session. The friend may well be another mental health service user who has never successfully engaged with mainstream despite the best efforts of the bridge building service. Where services have been unsuccessful a friendship and peer network can do the job far more effectively.
Mainstream reaches the places other services cannot reach and in the process it is able to create a cascade effect - a continuing path of development, recovery and individual growth.
Monday, 19 July 2010
Thursday, 15 July 2010
Discussing Mainstream
Bridge building for mainstream is now incorporated into the care pathway for people recovering from mental health conditions.
Community mental health teams, occupational therapies, psychiatrists are all aware of the value of mainstream bridge building. Many community mental health teams actively promote mainstream as part of their in-house practice with clients. Service-user led initiatives are also widely encouraged.
Where mental health teams may not always the time and resources to promote mainstream fully, there are many outside organisations working alongside the teams. The benefits of referral to an outside non-clinical team can be considerable.
Mental health teams can often discuss mainstream with clients in a clinical or home setting. An outside organisation has more time and capacity to draw clients out into mainstream settings where a conversation can begin. This may well be and should be - a conversation about the client's hopes, dreams, goals and aspirations.
One of the bridge builder's roles is to help facilitate this conversation. Another role is to be clued-in with what mainstream has to offer. For example, a bridge builder specialising in arts and culture needs to know what outlets there are both locally and further afield. A client who wishes to develop skills in music production should be introduced to the mainstream venue or venues where this opportunity takes place.
Community mental health teams, occupational therapies, psychiatrists are all aware of the value of mainstream bridge building. Many community mental health teams actively promote mainstream as part of their in-house practice with clients. Service-user led initiatives are also widely encouraged.
Where mental health teams may not always the time and resources to promote mainstream fully, there are many outside organisations working alongside the teams. The benefits of referral to an outside non-clinical team can be considerable.
Mental health teams can often discuss mainstream with clients in a clinical or home setting. An outside organisation has more time and capacity to draw clients out into mainstream settings where a conversation can begin. This may well be and should be - a conversation about the client's hopes, dreams, goals and aspirations.
One of the bridge builder's roles is to help facilitate this conversation. Another role is to be clued-in with what mainstream has to offer. For example, a bridge builder specialising in arts and culture needs to know what outlets there are both locally and further afield. A client who wishes to develop skills in music production should be introduced to the mainstream venue or venues where this opportunity takes place.
Wednesday, 14 July 2010
Mainstream and the law
The Disability Discrimination Act (DDA 2005) makes it unlawful for a service provider to discriminate against a disabled person by refusing to provide any service which it provides to members of the public.”
'Service provider' refers to public and commercial sectors alike. A service provider may be a retail outlet, an NHS service, an employment bureau, a police station, a dating agency....the list is endless.
The implications for mainstream are highly significant. Clients referred from backgrounds of mental ill-health to mainstream life will encounter a new range of service providers. It is a social inclusion bridge builder's role to ensure that clients accessing mainstream are introduced to any service providers the client may have identified as key. Once a client is engaging with the services or products of that provider, he or she will be a beneficiary of the policies, procedures, insurance and legal obligations of that provider. The service user becomes equal with all the other consumers who are accessing mainstream as a matter of course. Consumers' rights are considerable.
Another result of the mainstream process is that it puts the responsibility for provision onto the mainstream provider. A client accessing a mainstream service such as a recording studio, for example, is a beneficiary of all that the studio provides. Provides not merely in terms of the studio service and products, but also in terms of the studio's policies, procedures, insurance and legal obligations. Equality with every other consumer creates an equal opportunities situation for the person now accessing mainstream.
Mainstream is not required to provide 'special settings' and nor should it. Mainstream should not stigmatize because of its awareness or unawareness of mental health issues. It should not stigmatize because stigma is not part of any reasonable access to a mainstream product or service.
'Service provider' refers to public and commercial sectors alike. A service provider may be a retail outlet, an NHS service, an employment bureau, a police station, a dating agency....the list is endless.
The implications for mainstream are highly significant. Clients referred from backgrounds of mental ill-health to mainstream life will encounter a new range of service providers. It is a social inclusion bridge builder's role to ensure that clients accessing mainstream are introduced to any service providers the client may have identified as key. Once a client is engaging with the services or products of that provider, he or she will be a beneficiary of the policies, procedures, insurance and legal obligations of that provider. The service user becomes equal with all the other consumers who are accessing mainstream as a matter of course. Consumers' rights are considerable.
Another result of the mainstream process is that it puts the responsibility for provision onto the mainstream provider. A client accessing a mainstream service such as a recording studio, for example, is a beneficiary of all that the studio provides. Provides not merely in terms of the studio service and products, but also in terms of the studio's policies, procedures, insurance and legal obligations. Equality with every other consumer creates an equal opportunities situation for the person now accessing mainstream.
Mainstream is not required to provide 'special settings' and nor should it. Mainstream should not stigmatize because of its awareness or unawareness of mental health issues. It should not stigmatize because stigma is not part of any reasonable access to a mainstream product or service.
Monday, 12 July 2010
Tools for Social Inclusion
Two major assessment tools have been developed for social inclusion. One is the social inclusion 'Web' and the other is the 'Star' or 'Recovery Star'.
Originally created by the National Development Team (NDT) the web is a simple and effective assessment tool based on five key social domains. The domains were identified as key in the research done in the late 90s and early 2000s around social inclusion.
On the web these domains appear as:
Employment
Education & Training
Arts & Culture
Faith & Cultural Communities
Volunteering & Befriending
Family & Neighbourhood
Services
What makes the web unique for mental health is that it does not record or measure symptoms or diagnoses. A client who wishes to record which services he or she accesses may include the psychiatrist or community mental health team. However, the main purpose of the web is to record the client's involvement in mainstream. More importantly, the web is there to identify client's goals and aspirations in terms of where he or she wishes to be in mainstream.
Originally created by the National Development Team (NDT) the web is a simple and effective assessment tool based on five key social domains. The domains were identified as key in the research done in the late 90s and early 2000s around social inclusion.
On the web these domains appear as:
Employment
Education & Training
Arts & Culture
Faith & Cultural Communities
Volunteering & Befriending
Family & Neighbourhood
Services
What makes the web unique for mental health is that it does not record or measure symptoms or diagnoses. A client who wishes to record which services he or she accesses may include the psychiatrist or community mental health team. However, the main purpose of the web is to record the client's involvement in mainstream. More importantly, the web is there to identify client's goals and aspirations in terms of where he or she wishes to be in mainstream.
Sunday, 11 July 2010
Social Inclusion - the mantra and the tantra
Social Inclusion - Does it exist?
Social Inclusion has long been a mantra for organisations representing clients who may be isolated or marginalised for one reason or another. Government think-tanks in the early 2000s identified key areas or social domains relevant to people's lives and development in the mainstream world. These are: employment, the arts, spirituality & cultural identity, volunteering, sports & healthy living, family and neighbourhood.
As a social inclusion bridge builder for mental health, I work with clients who wish to access Arts & Culture . The social inclusion approach will ask a client to identify which social domains they would like to prioritise for inclusion in mainstream. The bridge builder's role is then to signpost the client to the mainstream domain which has been prioritised. In order to facilitate this, bridge builders must have a wide network of local and regional contacts in his or her field of expertise. Further support relates only to how much or how little the client requests.
As Arts bridge builder for example, I need to know what is out there for clients who may wish to do arts courses or rehearse and record their music. Other clients may be seeking self-employment through tutoring, performing or composing. All of these aspirational goals have had successful outcomes, some of them quite outstanding. All the clients referred to mainstream come from a background of 'severe and enduring' mental health conditions.
The bridge building service is not a clinical or diagnostic one, although we work closely with Community Mental Health Teams. It is designed to enable clients to participate in mainstream, based on their own preferences, choices, skills and dreams. Clients are free to choose whether to disclose their illnesses or not.
When the arts bridge builder meets with a client, the key questions are 'what do you wish to see happen for yourself' or 'what would you like to do'. Bridge building focuses on aspiration, goals and innate gifts and talents. And that's it.
Social Inclusion has long been a mantra for organisations representing clients who may be isolated or marginalised for one reason or another. Government think-tanks in the early 2000s identified key areas or social domains relevant to people's lives and development in the mainstream world. These are: employment, the arts, spirituality & cultural identity, volunteering, sports & healthy living, family and neighbourhood.
As a social inclusion bridge builder for mental health, I work with clients who wish to access Arts & Culture . The social inclusion approach will ask a client to identify which social domains they would like to prioritise for inclusion in mainstream. The bridge builder's role is then to signpost the client to the mainstream domain which has been prioritised. In order to facilitate this, bridge builders must have a wide network of local and regional contacts in his or her field of expertise. Further support relates only to how much or how little the client requests.
As Arts bridge builder for example, I need to know what is out there for clients who may wish to do arts courses or rehearse and record their music. Other clients may be seeking self-employment through tutoring, performing or composing. All of these aspirational goals have had successful outcomes, some of them quite outstanding. All the clients referred to mainstream come from a background of 'severe and enduring' mental health conditions.
The bridge building service is not a clinical or diagnostic one, although we work closely with Community Mental Health Teams. It is designed to enable clients to participate in mainstream, based on their own preferences, choices, skills and dreams. Clients are free to choose whether to disclose their illnesses or not.
When the arts bridge builder meets with a client, the key questions are 'what do you wish to see happen for yourself' or 'what would you like to do'. Bridge building focuses on aspiration, goals and innate gifts and talents. And that's it.
Wednesday, 7 July 2010
Is anti-stigma the new stigma?
Is anti-stigma the new stigma?
The 'Time to Change' campaign challenges stigma and discrimination against people with mental health conditions. For the next phase of the campaign Time to Change is helping groups and individuals organise activities which actively cooperate in challenging discriminatory attitudes and behaviours.
Time to Change advises that 'at Get Moving events it is ideal if there is a 50/50 mix of individuals with experience of mental health problems and those without in order to maximise the amount of stigma broken down and the number of stereotypes challenged.' Events suggested are football games, group walks or 'a dance routine which is then performed'.
The campaign promotes 'social contact' and 'social contact theory' put into practice' to challenge stigma and discrimination'.
Why should people with mental health conditions have to access mainstream activities as part of a campaign?
Challenging discrimination is achieved primarily through engaging in mainstream as a contributor, a consumer or a provider. Many people with mental health conditions access mainstream activities, making their own choices as to whether to disclose or not. The most impact in challenging mainstream can be achieved by prioritising individual goals and aspirations. Support is also available to access mainstream from mental health organisations and bridge builders or through direct payments.
People who play football who happen to have mental health conditions are footballers. They aren't required to be 'positive mental health footballers'. People who play guitar who happen to have mental health conditions are guitarists, not mental health guitarists. People who are arts tutors who have a mental health condition are arts tutors. By continuing to tag mental health on mainstream activities and aspirations there is a danger of recycling stigma and not allowing people to move into valued social roles.
Could anti-stigma be the new stigma?
The 'Time to Change' campaign challenges stigma and discrimination against people with mental health conditions. For the next phase of the campaign Time to Change is helping groups and individuals organise activities which actively cooperate in challenging discriminatory attitudes and behaviours.
Time to Change advises that 'at Get Moving events it is ideal if there is a 50/50 mix of individuals with experience of mental health problems and those without in order to maximise the amount of stigma broken down and the number of stereotypes challenged.' Events suggested are football games, group walks or 'a dance routine which is then performed'.
The campaign promotes 'social contact' and 'social contact theory' put into practice' to challenge stigma and discrimination'.
Why should people with mental health conditions have to access mainstream activities as part of a campaign?
Challenging discrimination is achieved primarily through engaging in mainstream as a contributor, a consumer or a provider. Many people with mental health conditions access mainstream activities, making their own choices as to whether to disclose or not. The most impact in challenging mainstream can be achieved by prioritising individual goals and aspirations. Support is also available to access mainstream from mental health organisations and bridge builders or through direct payments.
People who play football who happen to have mental health conditions are footballers. They aren't required to be 'positive mental health footballers'. People who play guitar who happen to have mental health conditions are guitarists, not mental health guitarists. People who are arts tutors who have a mental health condition are arts tutors. By continuing to tag mental health on mainstream activities and aspirations there is a danger of recycling stigma and not allowing people to move into valued social roles.
Could anti-stigma be the new stigma?
Monday, 14 June 2010
Traditional cohorts in care provision
Service providers, staff, service users and carers are often perceived as the main groups comprising the traditional cohort of secondary mental health care provision. All this changes when mainstream practice is incorporated into care pathways. The effect of mainstreaming is that it introduces new stakeholders into the equation. Stakeholders chosen by the client as part of his or her recovery. Person-centred practice is designed to enable the person in recovery to access activities and outlets of their own choice in the mainstream environment. These outlets can be anywhere and everywhere, depending on the client's personal goals, hopes and aspirations.
Mainstream effectively destroys the stigma attached to recovery as it is longer attached to special settings, wherever this is the individual's preferred choice.
Mainstream effectively destroys the stigma attached to recovery as it is longer attached to special settings, wherever this is the individual's preferred choice.
Thursday, 20 May 2010
Planning for Good Mental Health & Social Inclusion: Course Testimonials
Planning for Good Mental Health & Social Inclusion
Training testimonials:
'Such a huge subject - well covered in the time allotted'.
'The course has enabled me to be 'more assertive in recognising and prioritising mental health issues'.
I shall 'develop a knowledge base of local services and encourage others to make appropriate referrals'.
'John is a very calm person. Used the background music to create a non-threatening, relaxed atmosphere'.
I shall 'explore in greater depths what services are available to individual clients'.
'I feel I am more aware of what to look for in myself and others'.
The course 'has made me more aware of the need to ensure people return to mainstream after illness'.
'Ideas and information given to think outside the box'.
The course reinforced 'the importance of mainstream social inclusion'.
I now have 'more awareness of organisations and can utilise the social inclusion 'web' tool in assessments.'
Training testimonials:
'Such a huge subject - well covered in the time allotted'.
'The course has enabled me to be 'more assertive in recognising and prioritising mental health issues'.
I shall 'develop a knowledge base of local services and encourage others to make appropriate referrals'.
'John is a very calm person. Used the background music to create a non-threatening, relaxed atmosphere'.
I shall 'explore in greater depths what services are available to individual clients'.
'I feel I am more aware of what to look for in myself and others'.
The course 'has made me more aware of the need to ensure people return to mainstream after illness'.
'Ideas and information given to think outside the box'.
The course reinforced 'the importance of mainstream social inclusion'.
I now have 'more awareness of organisations and can utilise the social inclusion 'web' tool in assessments.'
Monday, 17 May 2010
How mental health can enrich the work environment
People with mental health conditions who are returning to employment or even accessing it for the first time can often make exceptional contributions to the workplace.
Their previous experience can be considerable and many individuals returning to mainstream carry high levels of skills and expertise. It may also be the case that the previous workplace was a contributory factor and there is no desire to return to 'the scene of the crime'.
Individuals returning to mainstream often do so with care and caution. The pathway back to employment may begin with voluntary work or a part-time position. Often it provides an opportunity to discover an area of interest the individual has always wanted to take up but never had the chance. A part-time post in a related field can help to prepare the way for a full-time salaried position. The returning employee makes his or her way back into the workplace with new skills, new experiences and new life encounters.
An art tutor who understands mental illness from first-hand experience will apply non-discriminatory and more inclusive practice alongside his or her skills. An individual in recovery might discover through accessing a mainstream service that he or she has gifts that can be developed and extended.
The way back into mainstream for people who may have never worked due to illness needs to happen through gradual re-skilling and training. With good bridge building, clients can identify the kind of special gifts they may have never identified previously. Person-centred planning is designed to help clients discover genuine aspirations and goals. It is not designed to force individuals to fit into a particular job role nor to be assigned to sheltered employment outside mainstream, except where the individual feels this may be appropriate.
Identifying a suppressed aspiration as the cause of stress at work can lead to formidable achievement when previously hidden dreams are pursued and developed in the appropriate mainstream setting. This too creates employment or self-employment alongside increased cashflow and profits for the service providers and employers who are helping individual dreams to become reality.
Their previous experience can be considerable and many individuals returning to mainstream carry high levels of skills and expertise. It may also be the case that the previous workplace was a contributory factor and there is no desire to return to 'the scene of the crime'.
Individuals returning to mainstream often do so with care and caution. The pathway back to employment may begin with voluntary work or a part-time position. Often it provides an opportunity to discover an area of interest the individual has always wanted to take up but never had the chance. A part-time post in a related field can help to prepare the way for a full-time salaried position. The returning employee makes his or her way back into the workplace with new skills, new experiences and new life encounters.
An art tutor who understands mental illness from first-hand experience will apply non-discriminatory and more inclusive practice alongside his or her skills. An individual in recovery might discover through accessing a mainstream service that he or she has gifts that can be developed and extended.
The way back into mainstream for people who may have never worked due to illness needs to happen through gradual re-skilling and training. With good bridge building, clients can identify the kind of special gifts they may have never identified previously. Person-centred planning is designed to help clients discover genuine aspirations and goals. It is not designed to force individuals to fit into a particular job role nor to be assigned to sheltered employment outside mainstream, except where the individual feels this may be appropriate.
Identifying a suppressed aspiration as the cause of stress at work can lead to formidable achievement when previously hidden dreams are pursued and developed in the appropriate mainstream setting. This too creates employment or self-employment alongside increased cashflow and profits for the service providers and employers who are helping individual dreams to become reality.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)